Talk:Talk pages project/Usability: Difference between revisions

From mediawiki.org
Content deleted Content added
Wedhro (talk | contribs)
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 23: Line 23:


When looking at a talk page, what do you think would make it easier for you to know what conversations are worth reading? [[User:PPelberg (WMF)|PPelberg (WMF)]] ([[User talk:PPelberg (WMF)|talk]]) 02:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
When looking at a talk page, what do you think would make it easier for you to know what conversations are worth reading? [[User:PPelberg (WMF)|PPelberg (WMF)]] ([[User talk:PPelberg (WMF)|talk]]) 02:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

: Probably the ones worth checking are those with many replies, so maybe the TOC could show that number after the title, or add a symbol/icon, something like that.
: Also, some privileged user might have the power to manually highlight topics. This also could be shown in the TOC. [[User:Wedhro|Wedhro]] ([[User talk:Wedhro|talk]]) 04:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:36, 24 July 2021

Test page

This page has been set up as a wikitext talk page. This should make it easier to see and test the visual enhancements, but it might make it harder for people to notice replies, especially if they're editing at a different wiki. Please remember to @-mention or {{ping}} me and other people. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Moving page to Talk pages project/Legibility

@Whatamidoing (WMF): do you have any concerns about us moving this page to Talk pages project/Legibility?

Having articulated the objectives of this work (see #Objectives), I think "legibility" [i] more accurately describes the work we will be doing as part of this project and the impact this work is intended to have than "visual enhancements" does.


---

i. Here, I am using "legibility" to refer to what Kevin Lynch in The Image of the City as, "...the ease with which its parts can be recognized and organized into a coherent pattern. Just as this printed page, if it is legible, can be visually grasped as a related pattern of recognizable symbols, so a legible city would be one whose districts or landmarks or pathways are easily identifiable and are easily grouped into an over-all pattern.” PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@PPelberg (WMF), I like that name, but it might be confusing. It sounds like maybe changing the font size (e.g., so I can read without my glasses on). It might also get translated in odd ways, to mean something like "Readability". Maybe Talk pages project/Appearance? Talk pages project/Organizing? Talk pages project/Changing appearance? Talk pages project/Adding information? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Added information about discussions

@JKlein (WMF), you might want to look at w:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Article alerts. This is a bot-generated list of links to (mostly) other discussions, and it is interesting to see what extra detail/context the bot provides about these discussions. For example, the deletion list says how many people have participated in the discussion. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:19, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A question about reading talk pages

When looking at a talk page, what do you think would make it easier for you to know what conversations are worth reading? PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 02:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Probably the ones worth checking are those with many replies, so maybe the TOC could show that number after the title, or add a symbol/icon, something like that.
Also, some privileged user might have the power to manually highlight topics. This also could be shown in the TOC. Wedhro (talk) 04:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply